Friday, April 25, 2014

War, Lie and Jehad for Democracy

War and Lie for democracy is described here, by a former AP reporter Robert Parry. Even an MIT rocket scientist wonders if John Kerry Lied:
“According to our analysis, I would not … claim that I know who executed the attack, but it’s very clear that John Kerry had very bad intelligence at best or, at worst, lied about the intelligence he had.”
Robert Parry shows how  interest groups provide information to lazy bureaucrats to hijack govt agenda.

One such group is National Endowment for Democracy. This organization spends billions of dollars in a single country of target. It tries to influence writing national constitution, media coverage and organizing people for strikes.
Link to a post on cost in Syria. Most of the literature was manufactured by contractors of state dept [ ARK [Access Resources Knowledge], Chemonics, Creative [Associates International]—a number of the big contractors ] Read more. For Syria, a fresh college graduate was used to produce the war literature.

All this goes in name of Democracy. For the title of the post, "Jehad" was added to emphasize these wars are a lot similar to the old ones.

Updt : Friedman of NY Times now talks of "awe-inspiring burst of democratic aspirations" , even after his "Arab Spring" turned deadly.

Friday, April 11, 2014

Why Mao needed to study "dialectics"

I have the same question why I am reading what a dialectics is, but marxists have taken over all the institutions of India, they were dishonest to an ancient civilization , they were brutal and arrogant. The source of their confusion needs to be understood.

As per this book ( Mao Zedong on Dialectical Materialism: Writings on Philosophy, 1937 - p-125) Mao says the reason to study dialectics to achieve the objective of changing china and world. The change to aim liberation from national oppression and social oppression.

Dialectics : As per Angels, "It is therefore, from  the history of nature and human kind that the laws of dialectics are abstracted. For they are nothing but the most general laws of these two aspects of historical development. And indeed they can be reduced to three fundamental laws : transformation of quality into quantity and vice versa, the unity of contradictions and negation of the negation".

 Mechanical  Materialism(Objective world)/Dialectics and thought :   "While being laws of the objective world, laws of dialectics are also laws of subjective thought, and that is because laws of human thought are none other than the laws of the objective world reflected in the brains of humans through practice."

 In other words :
  • Laws of nature are already abstracted to this thing called dialectics. Marxists apply this dialectics and call it science.
  • Laws of nature can be derived from history. [ Ramachandra Guha, Romilla Thapper, DN Jha - all extreme secularists are eminent historians].  To understand Indian mediocrity and corruption, compare dialectics followed by Indian eminent to the laws of nature and its scope as espoused by works of of Richard Feynman, newton, Gauss, Einstein, Poincare,Lobachevsky, Schrodinger etc .   **
  • Laws of nature thus abstracted into this dialectics thing, ominously applies to human thought.  Once the eminent intellectuals knew the correct thought of civilization, what did they do to the Indian villages, Indian families, Bharat, Sanskara and depth of humanity ? 
  • An easy intellectual answer is possible for everything if you know dialectics and believe in it.

**There was an India  in the JNU History and Political science depts. It produced our ruling class. There was a Bharat that had long history of education, they knew sankhyA and Sankhya, Raga, Art and Sanskrit in their villages.  This Bharat managed to inspire IT employees for Tatas and Infosys, Philosophers to sweeten marxist utopia and in between some less than world class engineering in IITs and central labs.

Updt: An article in NY Times on Rising Marx.

Updt: Excellent article, it defines  material basis in a real life situation.This kind of things is widely used, It appeared strictly Newtonian.